Shalom all,
The number of IDF deaths since the beginning of the ground offensive has now reached 253. The total number of IDF deaths since October 7th stands at 597. We still don’t know how many hostages are still alive or who they are.
On Monday, March 25th, the United States abstained from voting on a U.N. Security Council resolution that called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. As a result, the Security Council finally achieved what it has been trying to do since the Israel Defense Forces entered Gaza over 5 months ago, namely: demand a ceasefire – at least for a limited period of time.
Earlier attempts by the Security Council to pass ceasefire resolutions were vetoed by the United States. Due to increasing tensions between President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the way in which the war should be conducted, and resolved, the U.S. sought a way to be able to abstain from the vote. A week ago, it was the United States that put forward a ceasefire resolution that was tied to the release of the hostages taken by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and “non-affiliated” Gaza civilians on October 7th. That resolution was vetoed by Russian and China.
Speaking of the present resolution, the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Linda Thomas-Greenfield, said that despite the inclusion in the latest proposed resolution of some of the edits requested by the U.S., still, Washington “did not agree with everything” and so it could not vote “yes” to the resolution, opting to abstain instead. The interesting thing to note about the excuse offered by the United States is that since it could not give an affirmative vote, it chose not to veto the resolution as it had done in the past, but allowed it to pass. The excuse to abstain is lame and places Israel in the position of a political and international pariah.
Thomas-Greenfield’s additional comment is instructive and reveals the hypocrisy of the U.S. decision to abstain from the vote, instead of vetoing it: “A ceasefire could have come about months ago if Hamas had been willing to release hostages…Any ceasefire must come with the release of all hostages.”
The position of the U.S., as stated by its representative, was clear: release the hostages, get a ceasefire. If that is the case, then the pressure should have been applied against Hamas during all this time, not against Israel. Once again, the ac-cent’ is being placed on the wrong syll-a’-ble.
Antony Blinken, the U.S. Secretary of State, added his explanation for abstaining, rather than for vetoing the resolution, which was different in its emphasis from that of the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.:
“Because the final text does not have key language we view as essential, notably a condemnation of Hamas, we could not support it. This failure to condemn Hamas is particularly difficult to understanding coming days after the world once again witnessed the horrific acts terrorist groups commit.”
So, looking just at the above two excuses of the U.S., we see that failure to condemn Hamas and the failure to link a ceasefire with the release of the hostages, combined to convince the U.S. to abstain, rather than veto the resolution. Are we really expected to believe that those excuses are sufficient to betray a friend, with whom an “unbreakable bond” is supposed to exist? A friend that is fighting to survive the onslaught of a relentless, totally immoral enemy that lacks even the semblance of a conscience of what is right and wrong. Enter power politics and personality issues – exit practical efforts to release the hostages being held almost half a year – a release that would be the catalyst to bring about a ceasefire. Enter cracks in an “unbreakable bond” between the United States and Israel.

The Dry Bones Blog – 28 March, 2024
The text of the U.N. resolution demanded “an immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan leading to a lasting sustainable ceasefire.” And, while the resolution also demanded the release of the hostages, it did not make the ceasefire dependent on them being freed. Following the vote, applause broke out in the chamber of the Security Council. Who were they applauding for? Certainly not the hostages, nor the families of the more than 1,200 who were killed in the south-west of Israel on October 7th.
As expected, Hamas and the “Palestinian” Authority cheered the resolution, while the Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Gilad Erdan criticized the decision for failing to condition the ceasefire on the release of the hostages. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the U.S. of abandoning its policy in the UN, of giving hope to Hamas of a ceasefire without having to give up its hostages, and of “harming both the war effort and the effort to release the hostages”.
Israel Minister of Defense, Yoav Gallant, said that Israel would continue fighting until the hostages were released: “We have no moral right to stop the war until we return all the hostages to their homes. If we don’t reach and clear and absolute victory in Gaza, it could bring a war in the north closer.”
A look behind the scenes: Hamas and the Hamas controlled Ministry of Health in Gaza cite unconfirmed numbers of civilians casualties. That narrative has been accepted by the President of the United States and by the vast majority of members of the U.N., who have displayed their anti-Israel bias long before the present Gaza war. The reason for the war has been ignored. The more than 1,200 murders of Israelis and over 240 hostages being held, abused, ill-treated and killed by terrorists whose ideology calls for worldwide Islamic Jihad and the subjection of all nations and religions to Islam, has been ignored. The continued threats to carry out additional October 7th atrocities has been ignored. The only thing that is of importance to the nations that condemn Israel is the number of casualties in Gaza.
We should not expect much from the U.N. that has seen fit to condemn Israel more than all other countries combined. But, from the U.S., our friend, we did expect a realistic appraisal of the situation that Israel is facing, fighting on seven different fronts at this point, not the least of which is in Gaza and facing a serious threat from the Hezbollah in Lebanon. We hoped for a demand for proof of numbers before blindly accepting the Hamas narrative of the number of deaths. “Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) reacted to claims that 30,000 Palestinians have been killed in the Israel-Hamas war — a claim that has been repeated by President Joe Biden — by stating that number includes a huge number of Hamas terrorists and also said that the war could end immediately if Hamas would surrender and release the hostages…And then we’re talking about now there [are] 31,000 Palestinians that were killed, and, well, you’re not talking about, well, 13,000 or more are actually Hamas fighters on that. So, why aren’t you breaking that out as well, too? And then, if you do, and talk about the casualty ratio, it’s actually very clear that this isn’t a genocide or that the Israelis are targeting civilians. In fact, the only ones that [target] civilians, that’s Hamas.”
The three Middle East countries that are most closely affiliated with Hamas (not including Iran, that is feeding it and encouraging it) are Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan. None of them has made any serious effort to help the citizens of Gaza or to exert pressure on Hamas. Egypt, which actually has a border with Gaza, is building a walled area near its border to prevent Gazans from entering (unless they have enough money to buy their way out of Gaza and into Cairo). Lebanon, which is in large measure controlled by Hezbollah, another Iranian proxy and a co-belligerent with Hamas, joined the fighting against Israel from the outset of the Gaza War. Jordan, which could rightly be said to be the place where so-called “Palestinians” should reside, only condemns Israel, without lifting a finger to pressure Hamas to release the hostages or offer displaced Gazans an option to move to Jordan and start their lives over. But, as the Hamas narrative becomes increasingly more acceptable, more countries seek to isolate Israel. And the latest proposal is to impose an arms embargo on Israel. And, as one commentator noted: This war is exactly what Hamas wanted.
“[As] fiercely contradicting narratives about the conflict have seized the global imagination — so much so that they may be changing the course of elections in the United States and United Kingdom — it’s worth reminding the world that Hamas is not a friend of the Palestinians. Instead, it’s a militia of fundamentalists whose primary goals are to prevent a two-state solution [not that such a solution is desired, realistic or even a solution – my addition] — the realization of which would involve a verboten acknowledgment of Israel as a legitimate state — and to spread Islamic theocracy. The dismaying truth of these aims has been lost in progressive spaces, where Hamas is often portrayed as a force of Palestinian resistance. Those on the left should understand that Hamas is not trying to achieve a Palestinian state or justice for Palestinians. Instead, it aims to prevent those very outcomes by moving Israelis to the political right through terrorist attacks.”
It is no wonder that The Economist ran a front cover last week declaring “Israel Alone”. But, when viewed from the hindsight of history, we see that we have, in essence, always stood alone – alone from the point of view of involvement with nations, but never alone from the watchful eye and protective cover of the God of all creation, who has designated Israel as the “apple of His eye” (Deuteronomy 32:10; Zechariah 2:8). Indeed, Dror Eyder, in his article in Israel Hayom: “3000 years of solitude: A response to The Economist Cover”, noted that the prophet Balaam, who was hired by King Barak of Moab (southern Jordan today) to curse Israel, refused to do, and referred to Numbers 23:9. “With his immortal words, Balaam shows himself to be a prophet who saw thousands of years into the future right up to the cover of the Economist and thousands of years beyond that: ‘As I see them from the mountain tops, Gaze on them from the heights. There is a people that dwells apart, Not reckoned among the nations.’ Not regular isolation, for we have ties with the nations of the world, we contribute and we benefit. Rather it is a special isolation that only someone taking a bird’s eye perspective of history (from mountain tops and heights) could have been able to see this from our beginning as a people: A people who for all our efforts to be accepted into the community of nations and to be treated equally, will never be counted as a normal nation. We will never belong to the family of nations, even if our contribution to humanity is priceless. And if, God forbid, we shall no longer be here, we will not be mourned as a family member. Not only in the synchronic sense do we not belong, but also in the diachronic; in other words, it is not only is our existence in the present different from that of all other nations, but we also travel along a different historic path to other nations.”
Only one verse earlier, Balaam asked: “How shall I curse whom God has a not cursed? And how am I to curse him whom the LORD has not cursed?” (Numbers 23:8) The nations of today do not ask that question. If they did, they would have to acknowledge that “The Keeper of Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps” (Psalm 121:4) and that He who created Israel and formed us, and called us back to this tiny stretch of desert sand, says that we are not to fear, because He has called us by name and we are His! (Isaiah 43:1).
The community of nations is tredding on thin ice, if it thinks that it can unite to condemn Israel and succeed. “Those who do not fail to learn from history, are condemned to repeat it”. (George Santayana – 1905). Mark Twain, in his essay “Concerning the Jews” (published 1899) understood that. We can ask whether the community of nations today understands that our calling extends for around 3.5 millennia and that no decision from the United Nations will diminish that calling. We can ask ourselves whether we understand that as well. We have been instructed not to put our trust in princes, in mortal man, in whom there is no salvation, but to hope in the LORD our God (Psalm 146:3, 5).
As we look at the situation facing Israel today, we realize that the war that we have been fighting has been in existence for far longer than just six months. The world must come to an understanding that our fight against the terrorism of Hamas and similar entities, is a fight not only against an enemy determined to destroy Israel, but against an enemy that seeks to subjugate the other nations and religions of the world under an Islamic caliphate. The conclusion of Dror Eyder is appropriate in this context:
“Israel’s war against Hamas is not merely a localized affair. It is the war of the entire free world against tyranny that seeks to enslave the world in the name of faith in a pagan death cult. The moral perception of the nations that preach to us not to enter Rafah and finish off the job, stems from a confusion between private morality and political morality. We are not fighting individuals – as miserable as they may be – but a nation whose unifying core is the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews wherever they may be. As far as they are concerned, the Jews are the spearhead of all Western (Judeo-Christian) civilization. For them Israel is only the outpost of this civilization; our enemies believe (and they have stated as much thousands of times) that we are the gateway to the collapse of the entire West. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the West not to leave Israel alone, but to strengthen it and hasten reinforcements. We’ve got you covered.
Is Israel isolated? Perhaps. There is nothing new in that. As always, we will survive and win. The God of Israel did not bring us back to Zion after thousands of years in exile, in order to toy with us. The question is, will the West understand that its long-term existence lies in the balance? Remember the words of the old prophet Balam. Learn from him and act in accordance.”
On another note, it appears that the creators of the calendars this year have once again placed the cart before the horse, by designating a celebration of Resurrection Day (referred to erroneously by some as “Easter” or “Pascha”, an early Middle English term for “Easter”) long before the date for the Feast of Passover. If we try to draw a parallel with the present Gaza War, we see that a reversal of facts and events tends to be the trend in modern thinking. Then again, tomorrow is another day and the beginning of a new week. The cares and concerns of this day are passing away. So, hope springs eternal and there is always a renewed cause for optimism.
Despite our situations, may we still bless, be blessed and be a blessing.
Have a good week.
Marvin


